This video will be about my ongoing Janet Bloomfield trial, and it will be about my last video, “On Prostitution”.
And the first thing I really want to get out there is: I was not claiming that prostitution rapes a man. I only said if we were going by what constitutes as rape today, than yeah it’d be rape. But let’s face it, the majority of us reject the bulk of what is getting called rape. Anyhow, more on all that later.
And before I get into that, I just want to say something.
Something that has nothing to do with this video, but I want to just mention before I forget it, is when the tradcons talk about traditionalism producing more children, and thus those who do not reproduce will be replaced by those who do.
That statement of theirs, that I have argued before, by explaining that genes getting reproduced is not the same as ideologies getting reproduced.
Well someone recently argued me that children carry out the ideologies of their parents. Just like Muslim parents have Muslim kids in Muslim countries and Christian parents have Christian kids in Christian countries.
He says that because MGTOW won’t reproduce, or will not at a high enough rate, that the ideology is always destined to get washed out and replaced by the traditionalist ideology, because traditionalists breed more kids.
Well, as a preemptive strike on this being the new copy paste that tradcons start echoing, let me just say:
firstly, no traditionalism doesn’t breed the highest amount of offspring. You have to take a lot of liberties with the word “traditional”.
It’s single parent mommies in the ghetto that breed in the highest numbers.
Though you can play with the math and make it look like married couples performing traditional division of labour, breed in the highest numbers, only on per capita; not in total.
I have seen multiple statistics trying to back their claim. Unfortunately it all gets muddied up in how statistics are being gathered. And realize, just like feminists have their bullshit statistics, so do conservatives. Not that it’s even that relevant to the argument.
Secondly, the same could be said against feminism. Most people were traditionalists, but why didn’t they breed all traditionalist daughters? How come feminism took off if feminism doesn’t yield such high birthrates?
The answer is because as I have stated, ideologies do not get passed on through genes.
As for religions being adopted from the parents teachings… well I believe that most likely has to do with the surrounding culture reinforcing it. Secondly, I think teaching people fear of eternal damnation if you don’t believe in a particular god, can be more scarring and stick with them.
Point being, I believe the dynamics of religion and ideology may be different. Again, I point to the fact that feminism is anything but old fashioned patriarchy / traditionalism. Yet it caught on enough and continued for enough generations to completely turn society on its head. And so can MGTOW.
“those who breed will replace those who don’t” does not apply to ideology.
I just wanted to get that out of the way, and put it out there in case that argument becomes “a thing” from the tradcons.
And now on to an update regarding Janet’s trial.
I have been having a difficult time doing this. Mostly because Janet’s blog is obnoxious and I hate reading it. The bulk of it is… how can I put this… it’s a catty, snarky… mommy blog. She’s like one of those pointless mommy bloggers, a testament to the fact stay at home moms need to leave the house and do something productive.
But she’s not on trial for her style, or entertainment value.
And truth be told, this trial, as a proxy trial or prelude for AVFM, has been rendered pointless.
Paul Elam has made an ass out of himself big time just the other day. If you think he stuck his foot in his mouth regarding MGTOW before, you ain’t seen nothing yet. I’ll link his video if you haven’t seen it.
Anyhow, fuck Paul Elam, fuck AVFM.
But I would like to finish Janet’s trial, just for the sake of finishing what I started.
It’s difficult not only because it’s a lot to read over, but also because even trying to determine what she is saying is difficult.
Let me just give you an example. Let’s take a look at one particular blog entry, not because it is special, but because it is just so typical, and perfectly illustrates everything I am trying to get across about it.
In between taking shots at feminism, and here and there defending men, a lot of her blog is about attacking working mothers, and praising stay at home mothers.
IS that traditionalist advocacy? Well yes it is. But what I am wondering though is, has she turned over a new leaf? Between some of her newer work, and her newer videos, there is a change, and that does need to be looked at and put into perspective.
But when you take a look at that blog entry I just showed you… how can I explain this.
She started off by defending stay-at-home motherhood, claiming it is not prostitution. She went on a good long tirade about how much it is not prostitution… then ended her fucking blog entry by stating if you and the husband get into a fight, turn it into sex (I swear to god this is not healthy), and then you won’t be as mad, and he’ll probably give you what you want.
And then tops it off by confessing she got things via sex, and oh what a whore she is.
She just had a long blog post about how being a house wife isn’t prostitution… and then kinda says it is.
And I’d write that off as a joke. But she’s made blog posts loudly defending prostitution, and other statements in other posts that lead me to believe it wasn’t a joke.
It’s like that video where she said no no I’m not a traditionalist and I have no problem with reversed gender roles or women getting a job… now let me just insist that it’s a marxist conspiracy that tricks women into getting jobs which weaken the family so that government can make you need them so that they can grow… but no, no problem at all with working mothers or reversed gender roles…
I swear, that’s what half her blog is like.
It’s like she’ll spend 90% of her time writing one thing… then out of the clear blue loudly and unmistakably contradict it.
And it leaves me just staring at her blog in disbelief. Forcing me to read over and over trying to figure it out.
Is it a joke? Is it sarcasm? was the first 90% of her blog satire that then ended on her real feelings? am I reading it wrong? is she just maybe, slightly, mentally ill?
Diana Davison commented that one of her Bloomfield quotes was accused of being taken out of context. To which Diana said more or less “how can you tell? all of her quotes seem out of context they are so random and bat-shit crazy.” Here, let me play the clip of Diana saying that.
( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OQ3rSqG44Sg&list=UUVRQqUgDRBevsDGOeE1DL3A from 3:37 to 4:02 )
Yeah, after watching the clip, I realized I paraphrased that badly. But I think it shares the same point, that Janet just blurts out weird off the wall things.
Janet does this so much, I some times feel like she may suffer from some kind of multiple personality.
If I didn’t know better, I’d swear Janet was a typical woman, who failed to achieve career success, and instead defaulted to traditionalism as plan B, and then took up a pseudo-traditionalist ideology to justify her plan B as being the greatest plan in the world. I think she has constructed for herself, an ideology based on defending her plan B so that she doesn’t have to face the reality of her failure.
I think she may be just that narcissistic, just that self righteous and self absorbed.
I have this sneaking suspicion that if her college degree had actually landed her a 100K per year job, she would be a feminist and a career woman today.
I think if she had a medical problem forbidding her to conceive, she would have taken her career failure and turned it into a testimony of patriarchy holding women back. She’d refer to stay at home mothers as parasites.
I just think Janet has constructed a self justifying ideology.
Like, it’s not enough for her to do or be anything, she has to construct a world wide righteous ideology to ensure herself that her choices are proper, and use that as a point of leverage to look down on others, judging them, as a type of “relational aggressive” bullying. And this bullying being done to deflect the negative reality of her decisions.
But there are a few factors that suggest that might not be true.
None-the-less, I need to continue looking over her work.
Anyhow, on with the video, heading into the portion where I explain my last video.
On my last video, called, “On Prostitution”, I got pretty controversial and ruffled some feathers, and I knew I would.
And I’ll be honest, the backlash (if you can call it that) wasn’t as bad as I expected.
I’m not afraid to be controversial and take it to the next level, even if others in this movement aren’t ready to go further down the rabbit hole. A part of being MGTOW is leading and not caring if anyone is following. MGTOW philosophy has always been cutting edge and ahead of the curve.
And I also believe we are at a point where even going in the wrong direction is better than the endless stagnation of copy pasting 5 year old MRA arguments about the wage-gap myth or whatever.
For those of you who can’t innovate and push the envelope; fine, just copy pasta.
What I think is interesting is, had I made a video 3 or 4 years ago about why it’s OK to accept gays in our movement, I would have been controversial, and according to some; out of my mind.
Today, can gays be a part of the mens movement? Of course they can. They’re men. They get assaulted on the street by women and can’t hit back because they don’t have a gay card they can wave in front of everyone to say (no no, it’s cool, I have a penis but I’m protected by the LGBT). Bisexual men fight for custody rights in a divorce and have two things working against them:
1. they’re men and we all know men shouldn’t be around kids.
2. he’s not straight, and them queers ain’t gonna do nothing but molest their sons anyhow.
He has 2 strikes against him. So of course he wants to tear down the notion that only women should have child custody.
There are a lot of reasons why gay men legitimately want to be part of a pro-mens movement.
And the fear that if we let gays join our MRM club, they’d gay it up or hijack it. That fear is all but dead now. And I believe it was MGTOW that probably inspired this acceptance. A man’s sexuality is his business; any effort to control a mans sexuality is an attempt to control men. Even homophobia has been used to keep men in their rough and tough manly-man state of mind. MGTOW said loud and clear “Fuck gender roles, I’m people god damn it, don’t tell me what I have to do or can’t do, I’m going my own way bitch. So save your shaming language and your homophobic accusations. I won’t let you and your gynocentric social norms define me.”
That attitude from MGTOW, I believe, did a lot to quell the homophobia in the movement.
Had I made a video in 2008 that men could be raped by women, most in the anti-feminist community would have laughed. Raped by other men, sure, but not by a woman.
Today talking about men being raped is standard rhetoric in the MRM.
Ever since I took up the label MGTOW, I have done a lot to try to understand this movement’s origins. And while I am not a MGTOW expert and certainly won’t claim to be. It is my conclusion that MGTOW have always been the philosophically progressive, the innovators, always ahead of the curve, the trend setters. While the rest of the psychologically conservative anti-feminist community only copy pasted what was normal and “safe”. They were always fear driven and afraid of change. MGTOW, I believe, has been the underlying driving force, forcing change into a reactionary movement afraid of change.
I think MGTOW will always be seen by the mainstream movement as scary, crazy, evil, “just as bad as the feminists” and so on.
We’ll always be the minority, and that’s OK, because a tiny little tugboat can pull a huge ship in stagnant waters. MGTOW in its movement form, is the antithesis of stagnation.
So I’d much rather be wrong and put it out there, than to play it safe and copy pasta everyone else’s work.
As far as it making us look bad or extreme… we’ll always look bad. As Ravishing Rick Rude said, we’re the villains, the heels, the anti-heros of society.
And I personally am no politician. I’m not here to kiss babies and spit out feel good rhetoric and win votes. Popularity is for politicians and high school cheerleaders, not for philosophers and inventors.
Anyhow, most of the objections and arguments were pretty reasonable. With the most common argument being:
“But restaurants exploit your hunger.”
And my response to this came down to:
but this is not a gender specific thing. Food establishments are neither male nor female. And the hunger they take advantage of is also neither a male or female thing.
I’ve made that statement numerous times. One individual retorted “what about tampons, they’re gender specific”.
And I’ll copy pasta my response:
Well it wouldn’t be predatory, it would be exploitative. And it would only be exploitative if something like, only the male sex could make & distribute them.
If something like that happened, and we had men paying their rent with tampons (which was free for them to make) and they could use these tampons as currency… than yes, under those circumstances it would be.
When stay-at-home husbands are living a free life because they distribute tampons to their wife. When men in back alleys are supporting their crack habit by selling women tampons. When men are getting out of speeding tickets by handing the female police officer a tampon. When women are fighting each other, competing over men, in the hopes that she can earn a man’s affection and he will give her tampons… yes, under those circumstances tampons would be exploitative.
There is a certain truth (key word “certain”) that all economic (or at least capitalist) trade is exploitative. However, it is a necessary exploitation. People who are “have-nots” are often manipulated by those who have. It’s an unfortunate truth of life, and no one has ever devised an all equal or all voluntary society. Societies have always consisted of those who have and those who don’t; acting as a power dynamic to pressure, coerce, manipulate and exploit others. Maybe we’ll find a solution to that, maybe we never will. It’s not important.
Not all exploitation is created equal.
Sex is a woman’s female advantage over men. When it is used to leverage herself over a man, it is exploitative.
I also want to clarify something some people didn’t seem to understand about that video.
I was not claiming the john & prostitute dynamic to be actual rape.
My description of prostitutes as child molesters, was a colorful metaphor. And I do however, have great disdain for sex workers. If a woman tells me she is a sex worker, to me, on a personal and emotional level, it’s like some guy saying “yeah I got busted molesting some kid, and now I am a registered sex offender”. I get pretty much the same feeling. I’m not asking you to feel the same way.
And perhaps my colorful description of the prostitute as a pedophile was misunderstood, and I probably shouldn’t have gone with that sort of poetic language.
And the other thing I want to clear up. My suggestion that prostitution remain illegal, wasn’t based on: it should be illegal because it hurts men. I think that was probably the greatest misconception.
I was saying it should remain illegal to stop it from becoming a heavily government regulated industry.
I mean, I recall saying that if pushing to force DV shelters to be gender neutral fails, we ought to push for the government to fund male DV shelters. Heck, pushing male DV shelters might pressure the system to give in and just make DV shelters gender neutral. Well I had the libertarians in the audience ready to nail me to a fucking cross. Because how dare we even consider helping men if it could lead to a 0.1% tax increase.
But hey, if you want a massive government regulated prostitution industry, which will be sure to raise your taxes and give one more thing for feminists to have a monopoly on.
I just think it’s odd I mentioned one thing that could help men out a lot, but due to the microscopic government involvement and taxes, I became the Satan of MGTOW. But hey, jacking our taxes through the fucking roof to regulate a feminist controlled prostitution industry and protect female sex workers is perfectly cool with everyone.
And for people who don’t think feminists would push hard for any and every conceivable regulation to empower and protect the female sex workers and tranny sex workers… have you just not actually been paying attention to what feminists do?
And to those of you who think government wouldn’t jump on this to expand its own power. Let me ask you something, specifically to all the people who buy into this shit that government wants women to work, and they want to blur the gender lines, to create family destabilization to force reliance on government for social aid, so that government can grow and grow until we are so reliant on government that it becomes a totalitarian state, and within its totalitarianism it will smash capitalism and “re-educate” the people into communism…. and that’s how the commies are gonna get us.
For all you people who believe in that nonsense, you don’t think government would take THIS massive opportunity to expand its power and taxes?
So let me get this straight, communists will implement a 15 stage cryptic assault on the American public containing more plot twists than an M Night Shyamalan movie… but it wouldn’t take a one step approach?
This is seriously why I wish we’d all just get out of the matrix already and prioritize our focus on what is good for the male sex, and to hell with Wall Street and the price of tea in China.
At any rate, I don’t much care one way or the other about its legalization. I personally believe this would expand feminist control over it, and expand government regulation of it and add to government growth. But that part doesn’t bother me too much since I stick to how it effects the gender dynamic.
Back to the exploitation aspect.
The exploitation I speak of in the John and Prostitute relationship, is specifically women having power over men. It’s not a race struggle or a class struggle, it is a sex struggle.
I seriously don’t know why we, within gender politics, fear talking about male and female disadvantage. You’d figure that would be the primary topic found in a mens rights movement.
I think it has to do with fear of being a victim.
We often have tradcons, noobs, blue pill guys, whatever, say “You MGTOW just want to be victims.”
Now, I’ve always had a problem with the word “want” in that statement. Because what does it mean?
I doubt anyone actually wants to get victimized. Who wants to get raped, robbed, falsely accused, or mugged? Who honestly wants their social status or legal rights taken away from them? No one.
So what does the statement mean?
Well it could mean 2 other things.
1. You just want to see yourself as a victim.
2. You just want others to see you as a victim.
OK, now those two things make sense. A person who sees himself as a victim, gives himself license to hate or harm others. All hate is justified because “I’m a victim”. All harm committed onto others is OK because “I’m the victim, I’m just retaliating”.
The victim stance is a powerful one.
The other being, if society accepts you are a victim, then society grants you a license to hate and harm others, because you’re the victim.
So the first one is self justification to hate and harm. The second is outward justification to hate and harm.
That is my only interpretation of “you just want to be a victim”.
But let’s go deeper: what if I want to see where I am disadvantaged? What if, I want to observe my situation, determine what my strengths and weaknesses are, and determine where I am advantaged and disadvantaged?
Is there anything wrong with that?
How can men fight for equality if we do not allow ourselves to acknowledge inequality?
How can we effectively fight for our justice, if acknowledging our injustice, equates to “wanting to be a victim”?
How can we effectively fight a war for equality if we are only allowed to belly ache about feminism, and never look beyond that?
It is advantageous, nay, down right essential, that we explore ways in which we as men are unequal, disadvantaged (i.e. victimized).
Even if we come to the ultimate conclusion that this or that inequality is unresolvable. It is still helpful that we acknowledge its existence. For example, men can’t physically have babies. Women got us beat.
Is acknowledging this a matter of me wanting to be a victim? Even if so, is anyone going to deny that men can’t give birth?
Now there might be something to this gripe if I then proceeded to say that us men have been “cheated by society” is why we can’t have babies. Or if I proclaimed we should petition congress to change this.
I proclaim sex is a mans weakness. Men want sex more than women. I don’t think this is disputable.
Because men want what only women can give them. By virtue of mother nature, women have a monopoly on sex, and get to set the price.
Because of this, women ultimately control men.
This isn’t me wanting to be a victim. This is just me acknowledging how shit works.
Men on average are significantly stronger than women. Again, on average.
And women are significantly more desired sexually.
The first statement is one of superiority / advantage. The second statement is one of inferiority / disadvantage.
So, after making both statements, am I “just wanting to be a victim” or am I “just wanting to be dominant”?
How about neither. How about, I am just assessing gender dynamics.
Interesting how we as a society will acknowledge strength to be a man’s advantage over women, yet not tolerate the use of force against women.
When two men get into a fight, unless someone was seriously injured, or one of the participants laid on the ground begging for mercy while being beaten, we (society) typically stay out of the fight that doesn’t concern us, and cops need not be involved. And the same is true for two women.
But if a man and a woman get into a fight, we instantly recognize that the male is exploiting the situation of his physical dominance, his biological gift of strength is being used against a person who’s biology has cursed them to be physically weaker.
We see this, and we call it injustice, we call it bullying, we call it dishonorable behavior.
We as a society defend the weak female from the strong male. We understand that the man is significantly advantaged.
A man using force or the threat of force, against any woman, is automatically a “no no”.
And it’s like this because we acknowledge the difference in power. We are aware of the power dynamic here.
But when it comes to sex, we as a society refuse to see the power dynamic between the sexes. But it is there. Deep down inside, we all know it’s there.
We’ve always known the phone sex industry has been centered on mens need for stimulation from women; not women paying $5.99 a minute to rub her clit to a man talking dirty to her. This is true with the entire porn industry.
We know it is men paying female prostitutes, and not women paying male prostitutes.
Bars have ladies night, but they don’t have mens night. Because women aren’t going to buy drinks for men. Men are the desperate thirsty ho’s paying for women to give them affection and sex.
And anyone that tries to say “yeah well some women buy some porn, and there are gigolos and…”
Just stop it. Stop trying to tell me the rule doesn’t exist because there is an exception to it.
Women have great power over men. As much as men can physically dominate women, women can sexually dominate men.
But because men are too full of “male pride”, he won’t admit that women have sexual power over him.
Because he is too ashamed, too chicken shit, he won’t confess this vulnerability.
So women have been given full reign to sexually tease men, and then claim harassment if men look, gesture, or comment.
If men could drop their fragile tender manly pride for a moment, confess that women have sexual power over them, we as a society would see women sexually teasing men, as being on par with a man verbally sexually harassing a woman.
But men are so crippled by their male identity as strong, in control, invulnerable, that women say “we can wear whatever we like, and you men need to man up, take it like a man, keep it in your pants, and mind your manners.” And men instantly shut up, and take it, because they wouldn’t want to confess women have sexual power over him, or that he has an exploitable weakness.
Again, this happens mostly because we as a society just won’t admit that women have sexual dominance over a man, and that men have a severe crippling weakness, his sexual needs. If we could acknowledge that power dynamic, we’d be healthier for it.
And that’s the interesting thing about male pride, or masculinity, is that in many ways it cripples men, actually makes them weak, easily controlled.
A man takes pride in his masculinity, or male identity (how ever you want to look at it). He takes pride in it. Masculinity is being strong and brave.
Therefore a man must never admit fear, and must never be weak or admit weakness.
This means you can do anything you want to him. He’s like a slave who has to take your abuse and keep his mouth shut.
Punch him in the gut. And if he complains, say “awe, what’s the matter did that hurt the big strong man? Are you that weak?”
And he will instantly become so full of shame he will say “no, no it didn’t hurt a bit, I’m just fine. I am male, I am strong, I cannot be hurt, I am man hear me roar!”
Remember the white feather campaign?
Young men were enlisting to avoid the shame and embarrassment of being called chicken.
Wow, if that isn’t a testament to male weakness, I don’t know what is.
Young men were so easily manipulated into risking their lives, just to avoid having his man-card taken away.
I mean, really, what does that say about how fragile and weak the male ego is? So weak, so tender, it is better a man die, than to admit weakness.
And thus so easily manipulated.
It takes courage to admit to cowardice. It takes strength to admit to weakness.
A true act of cowardice is allowing yourself to be abused, exploited, or manipulated, just to keep your “male pride”.
I’m not telling men to be ashamed of their maleness, or their masculine tendencies. I’m saying don’t take pride in it. Don’t defend that male identity.
If you have the courage to admit to your weakness and cowardice, you will no longer be controlled by it, and that will ultimately make you a stronger person.
Men have two crippling weaknesses. His need for sex, and his fear of being seen as unmanly (afraid, weak, vulnerable, delicate, victim).
The white feather campaign used a mans masculine pride to manipulate him into risking his life in war.
Male pride silences husbands who are physically attacked by their wives.
Male pride keeps the mouths of little boys shut when they’ve been molested or raped. After all, if a young boy confessed to anyone, he was coerced by a female into sex, than he is called a fagot for not being proud of getting laid. If he admits to anyone that another male touched him, violated him, he will be seen as a fagot, or as being less of a male since he was made into a woman.
It’s my understanding, that in the congo, wives some times divorce their husbands when their husband was raped, because to be penetrated makes him a woman.
Even in Rome, there was a special way of looking at what men and women were in regards to homosexuals and heterosexuals. The rule basically came down to their being two kinds of people, those who penetrate and those who get penetrated. That which is penetrated is female.
In prison, you can force your penis in a man’s ass, and you are not gay. You see, the man you penetrated wasn’t male, he was female, because he got penetrated. You’re only gay if you get penetrated. That type of mentality is a part of prison rape culture.
This way of thinking is old, and is derived from how we view our sexual function. It is true that the male penetrates the female. So, on some psychological level, this is how we determine what sex someone is. Obviously in science it goes by which of the two physically gives birth. But on a psychological level, it’s which ever gets penetrated is female. And this manifests into our language and cultures.
A young boy gets coerced into sex, or even penetrated, and he remains silent. He allows it to continue happening, because he is that terrified of having his man-card revoked in the eyes of society.
Men who are raped in the congo would rather keep his raping a secret, because he would not want to have his man-card taken away.
Young men enlisted, risked dying, just to hold on to their fragile male pride.
Men make themselves into victims by being too afraid to admit victim hood.
Women will tease and deny and sexually manipulate men, and men will keep their mouths shut, because the slightest mention that he is being manipulated by his weakness, terrifies him. So he allows the abuse and the exploitation to continue.
Teenage girls with huge tits wearing sexy clothes in school. And if a male student is aroused or distracted by this, he’s the bad guy for not keeping himself under control. Because a real man, a manly-man, wouldn’t allow a woman’s sexual allure, to have power over him. Only a weak male would allow a woman’s teasing and tempting to get to him.
And the same is true with the male teacher who has to be distracted by these female students.
Men will not come right out and admit that women have so much power over his dick. If we as a society would acknowledge this, than when women use their biological advantage over us, it would be visible to everyone, that abuse and bullying is taking place. A man’s weakness is being used against him by a female who chooses to use her advantage against a man.
Women know they have this awesome advantage. And women know they can use it, and men are just too terrified to admit women have power over him. It’s humiliating for the man. It threatens his male identity.
Women will use their sexual advantage over men, and dare them to complain about it. To complain about it is to admit victim hood, and that terrifies a man, it isn’t manly, he’ll get his man-card revoked.
I encourage my fellow man to not allow women to have sexual power over you. If you are paying money to a woman, be it a hooker, house-wife, girlfriend, cam girl, you are allowing a woman to exploit your needs.
And no, it’s not like paying money to a restaurant for food. It’s nothing like that.
I’m not saying you can’t be MGTOW and fuck hookers. I’m saying you handing money to a hooker to alleviate your sexual frustration, is you willfully taking part in your exploitation, empowering and enriching a woman at your expense.
Even when you so much as buy a movie ticket for a woman as an excuse to take her out on a date, you are buying an opportunity to fuck her. You are sacrificing your belongings. You are allowing her to benefit by virtue of her womanhood. You are allowing her to benefit due to your male weakness. You are allowing her to benefit at your expense.
Women benefiting from their beauty is female privilege; I encourage you to stop feeding their female privilege.
We’ve said it time and time again, women have automatic value. Their reproductive organs give them worth. Well who’s fault is that? On one hand it’s mother nature. But ultimately, it’s your fault when you’re the one handing her money to a service that she would not pay you for.
Every time a woman profits from her femaleness, it is being done at the expense of men, it is her exercising her natural female advantage.
The less you accommodate her, the less of an advantage she has.
Using mens sexual needs against them is girl power. It is the heart of girl power.
The more men give into that, the more they are empowering women.
I know some of you might be wanting to say “Razor, you don’t really expect all of society to boycott giving women money for sex do you? There’s always going to be some desperate male handing money or movie tickets to a woman.”
I’m not claiming that all men can join forces and boycott this behavior.
What I am suggesting and encouraging is that we who call ourselves MGTOW. We who reject gynocentrism. I ask that we reject the power pussy has over us.
I’m not asking that we all give up pussy (though I have).
I am encouraging you to not allow it to have power over you.
When you hand over money for it, it is having power over you.
If you can get your sexual needs satisfied by a woman, without sacrificing something, without her profiting off of it, than pussy has no power over you.
If you can achieve sexual satisfaction without a woman at all, that is ideal. But that may be difficult for most men. I doubt a lot of men will ever reach that state of being.
Again, female empowerment is being able to control men by, or profit from, their sexual needs.
Girl power is wearing a shirt that says the honest to god truth “I have the pussy, I make the rules”.
Women do have the pussy and they do make the rules. That’s their advantage. A man’s weakness for pussy is a woman’s strength. I encourage my fellow man to not feed womens empowerment.
Do not allow women to profit from your sexual needs. To do so, is to be exploited.
Now, for those of you who are going to continue to insist that there is no exploitation, and want to insist it’s a voluntary contract yada yada.
Well, I can see you’re not letting go of the matrix. That’s old fashioned court room thinking, it’s judiciary thinking, positive and negative rights, contracts, leftism and rightism, and all that other matrix-think. Yeah that’s my new word “Matrix-Think” and “Matrix Minded”. I’m coining those phrases, bitches.
All that constitutionalism, legislative branch, judiciary branch, left vs right. That’s all back in the matrix.
I want you to look at the human factor. Don’t depersonalize this into a legal contract. Look at the fact that you are paying her for sex. She is not paying you for sex.
Sex is a thing both of you can give. And you can give it for free. But she is charging, because she is in control.
You can’t tell me there isn’t a power balance in her favor.
It is wrong for a woman to profit off of a man’s sexual needs. It is wrong for a woman to offer it, and it is wrong for a man to comply with it.
And when I say wrong, I don’t mean illegal. I just mean, it’s females benefiting off of the weakness of males.
And for those of you who just aren’t going to be convinced, well then, the thing I am wondering is: what do you have against traditionalism?
A woman stays home, relaxing and being supported by her husband.
Sure they talk a tough game about being a chef and a waitress and day care worker and a teacher and a butler and a maid and a nurse and how they perform a million in one duties and being a stay at home mom is the hardest job on the planet. But we know it’s bullshit. When all is said and done, house-wives contribute a small fraction to the family. The whole damn thing rests on the man’s shoulders. Why does he carry this dead weight of a woman? Because she has the power of the pussy, and she is his stay-at-home hooker.
He wouldn’t tolerate this from his stay at home son, his failure to launch son. Looking after a couple of kids for an hour or two after school and some light house work, would not justify his 25 year old pot head of a son not having a job, and never planning on getting one, and living there rent free. All the dinners he fixes, all of the after-school hours he baby sits his younger siblings.
The patriarch of the house would never call that “earning your keep”. He’d tell that boy to get off his ass and get a job and find his own place.
But when it is his wife performing the same task, she gets a free ride because… pussy.
The whole god damn thing is a long term prostitution contract no matter how you dress it up.
He’d never tolerate his brother living there… indefinitely. No matter how many dinners he makes, toilets he scrubs, floors he vacuums, appointments he makes and hours he watches the kids. He would not let his brother live in that house rent free forever. He most likely would not allow his son to do it either.
Because ultimately, underneath all the bullshit, all the feel good lies a man convinces himself of, when all is said and done, that stay-at-home wife is living rent free because he is paying for her pussy.
And ain’t nothing sadder than a man paying a prostitute to live with him and pretend to love him.
Funny thing is. The women themselves get all this brain chemical shit going on. And they can feel “attracted” to the man paying for her. But if he should fall from grace, and suddenly she has to get a job, and he isn’t doing a whole lot of bread winning… then out the door his useless ass goes, she wants a divorce. And she’ll never admit to him, the kids, the judge, or herself, that all that magical lovey dovey shit she felt, ended the day he couldn’t buy her love.
Stay at home hookers.
Men propping up women… because he is weak.
Women living their lives as the princess class. Living their lives on the pedestals looking down at men. Because they have the power of the pussy.
And what I find funny is. We call the stay-at-home wife a prostitute, yet these same people then want to defend the prostitute.
We crucify the house wife for being a prostitute, but then celebrate the prostitute?
Doesn’t really sound consistent.
We say “I am not going back on the plantation”. But what is the difference between working for money, to hand it to a prostitute for sexual favors… every friday night. Or working for money to hand it over to the wife, every day?
There are only 2 differences here. The house wife will actually cook you something, and do a little house work too. The other difference being the contract.
And again, I want to make it very clear, I am not claiming you’re not MGTOW, or that you are a bad human being, if you pay for sex. I’m just saying, allowing women to exploit your male sex drive, is contributing to female advantage, girl power, and it belittles you.
I’m not making fun of you. I’m encouraging you (not pounding my fist and demanding) encouraging you to not allow yourself to be taken advantage of like that. Do not let your weakness, your sexual needs, to profit women. I encourage you to find other ways to fulfill your sexual needs. If you can get a woman to fulfill those needs for free, than excellent. If you can’t, there is free porn, there is cat fishing, and there are other ways.
A video I have been dabbling with here and there since last March, is on the topic of ways in which men can now, and hopefully more so in the future, alleviate his sexual frustration without benefiting women, and without the need for women at all.
It’s a big and complicated video, and I am never satisfied with what I got so far. So it’s going to be a while before that comes out.
Even if you are chronically hooked on paying cam-girls and hookers, I just want you to acknowledge that you, by virtue of your male sexual need, are being exploited. I just think it is important that we acknowledge that.
And I hope that in time our culture will consciously acknowledge this.
The truth is, we already know it. We just won’t come right out and fully admit it. But subconsciously, the knowledge is there.
It’s why women had to dress moderate, and in the middle east completely cover up.
It’s one of the reasons prostitution has been illegal almost every where since pretty much forever.
Men have always known women had sexual power over him, and many of our laws and customs and attitudes have been shaped by that dirty little secret we don’t want to come right out and admit.
It is time that we do come right out and admit. Sex is a woman’s power over men. The core of the man and woman dynamic is prostitution. A woman’s love is a thing you buy with cash because it’s not real. And a man’s love is primarily based on the sexual satisfaction a woman can give him.
The fact that a “loving relationship” is only one step removed from a back alley blow job, is a jagged pill to swallow, so we mask it, we decorate our relationship to make it more of something. We emphasize the additives, the “extras” of a loving relationship, because we, both men and women, are running a hundred miles an hour from the cold harsh truth of human pair bonding: pussy for cash.
Today, it is more true than ever before.
In a world where house work for a wife is practically non-existent, it is becoming more difficult for a bread winning husband to fool himself into believing his “relationship” is based on some amazing miracle called “love”. It is becoming more than ever, painfully obvious, he is paying for that woman’s sexual services, and she is using her god given biological advantage over him. Men are still working like a plow horse, and women’s contribution is shrinking and shrinking and shrinking. Trying to fool ourselves into believing a marriage is anything more than entering into a prostitution contract is becoming harder to believe.
Change needs to happen. In what ways will there be change and to what extent, and what will the outcome be and how long will it take. I don’t know. But change needs to happen.
And before any change can happen, we need to acknowledge womens sexual power over men. We need to admit our sexual needs are our weakness.
We need to start thinking about a woman’s sexual power over a man is like a mans physical power over a woman.
And we as individuals need to remove ourselves from being under womens power.
While some men can completely give up sex and relationships with women, others simply cannot.
I encourage you to make sure that in your sexual relations that you do not let women profit off of you.
Do not let women use and exploit you. And do not be too afraid to admit that you are vulnerable and capable of being exploited.
Well that wraps up this video. Hopefully my next video will be the final Janet Bloomfield video, and then a nice long vacation. In fact, before I even continue my Janet Bloomfield trial I think I may need to take a few weeks off.
When it comes to making videos, I tend to be either on or off all the way.
It’s like, once I start, I end up getting a hundred ideas in my head, and I have so much to say, and not enough time to say it.
And I just keep making one video after another. The weeks tick by, and I let everything in my life go. I just put all other things and activities on hold. It really consumes my life.
Paul Elam and others talk about MGTOW being angry. Well, I’m not really an angry guy. I rather enjoy life. I’m one of those people who can really enjoy the moment and find happiness and piece in simple things.
Life is short and I want to savor every moment. When I get on a video making kick, it ends up consuming me. And as time goes on, the quality of my videos tend to go down as well. Because I tell myself “one more video, just one more, and then I’ll relax for a few days. Oh let me just make this one brief little point, it’ll only take a few hours to make that video.”
And 19 hours later, with bloodshot eyes, the video is finished and I upload it the next day and just continue this kind of routine. And I start getting in a rush to finish a video and just get it over with.
I do things like wanting to make a joke here and there, but needing to find that clip of something some one said, and that means 30 minutes, maybe a couple of hours, just to find that one little clip. And I decide to skip it. I skip this I skip that, and the video quality suffers for it. So the longer I go on making videos, the lower the video quality gets. Then I get disappointed in myself for not producing the highest quality grade A video that I know I am capable of making.
So yeah, when I start making videos, it consumes me. I neglect friends and everything.
And so I am going to take a little vacation. Then finish up the Bloomfield trial, then take a very long vacation. And hopefully when I come back, I will be delivering higher quality videos.
The types of videos I want to focus on are the cartoon based. And the ones that are character driven. And when I do my MGTOW videos, I want to focus more on MGTOW as the personal; rather than the political.
Because MGTOW is personal, and it is political. And I have been heavily invested in the political side of it.
I want to move away from MGTOW bitching about or talking about women. That’s another staple of MGTOW. I’m not saying it’s wrong; I’m saying in many ways its spinning wheels.
It’s up there with repeating the same arguments and links to dispel the same tired old wage gap myths, or street harassment crying, and all the other repetitive feminist whining. It feels like a copy pasta slug fest. Same complaints, same retorts, over and over.
dissecting the male and the female, the dynamics and so on, this is important, but I think too often it becomes unimaginative. It becomes copying the same arguments, and creates an atmosphere of depressive complaining.
Admittedly there is too much of that in this movement. I want to focus MGTOW energy elsewhere, and help us to expand, help us to move forward.
I believe it is in the spirit of the MGTOW community to always be moving forward. Like I said, no hierarchies, no regiment, no order, just individuals acting as leaders, and not caring if others are following.
In some way, the MGTOW community is like a grouping of vagabonds, wondering from place to place. Always progressing and moving forward, parting ways and rejoining way up the trail.
Interesting how we’re all going our own way, yet so often find ourselves merging back together at some future date. Every man a leader unto himself.
Sure, many of us will be going our own way, in the same direction, but will veer off from time to time, and the pack will lose old members, gain new members who merge with us on our trail, and then they too shall veer off their own way, and old members rejoining.
It’s grass roots and instinctive, individual, and forever progressing and moving forward.
We’re all just feeling our way around, collecting data, and when we bump into each other at some future time, we share our discoveries, compare notes, and continue moving forward.
I fancy myself an innovator, and have little tolerance for stagnation. As fun as it has been to gripe about women or our relation to women, and as fun as it has been to pwn traditionalists, I personally need to head in a new direction, at least for a little while.
Those of you who want to continue exploring the male to female dynamic, and fighting traditionalists, go right ahead. That’s your way for the time being. Have fun. But I have other avenues of MGTOW to explore. And when we meet up, hopefully I will have some awesome things to report on.
So on my video vacation, I will have my mind in a new and different place, collecting information, giving us new ways of looking at ourselves. And pushing the envelope in new ways when I get back.
So, I’ll get that final Janet Bloomfield video done in a week or so, and then I’m off for a while.
Oh yeah, and in the mean time consider this: liberal, libertarian, conservative, capitalism, marxism… that stuff was back in the matrix, let it go.
PS. This message has been brought to you by “Copy Pasta” an annoying phrase I will continue to annoy you with 😛